MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075505419 · doi:10.1109/eic.2013.6554258

Adapting the FBG cavity sensor structure to monitor and diagnose PD in large power transformer

2013· article· en· W2075505419 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Küng, Lutang Wang, Sylvia Pan, Maria I. Comanici

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQPS Photronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsVibrationFiber Bragg gratingTransformerOptical fiberMaterials sciencePiezoelectricityFiber optic sensorElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringOpticsEngineeringVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber optics vibration sensors have been extensively studied over the last ten years they have mainly been used to capture low frequency signals. One of these investigations has been commercialized to measure and trend End Winding Vibration (SEW) inside larger power generators. This sensor consists of a twin grating cavity and can be used to monitor temperature change as well as vibration. This paper will discuss the adaptation of the FBG cavity structure into a broad band sensor capable of measuring a range of higher frequencies previously identified as PD signals in the transformer from 30K to 300 KHz. Other work has been done to explore the possibility of developing a fiber optics acoustic sensor. The incentive is to overcome the limitation of the resonant based, acoustic, piezoelectric PD sensors previously used to analyze and locate PD. Working in resonance, they are unable to reveal the detailed spectrum or the signature of the PD events. We want to improve the packaging material and structure, then optimize the coupling methods to enhance its signal to noise ratio. All our work is still based on the fiber gratings cavity structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207