FENSAP-ICE's Three-Dimensional In-Flight Ice Accretion Module: ICE3D
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two-dimensional and quasi-three-dimensional in-flight ice accretion simulation codes have been increasingly used by the aerospace industry in the last two decades as an aid to the certification process. Such codes predict two-dimensional sectional ice shapes, which are then manufactured from a light material and attached as disposable profiles on test aircraft to investigate them for stability under icing encounters. Although efficient for calculating ice shapes on simple geometries, current codes encounter major difficulties or simply cannot simulate ice shapes on truly three-dimensional geometries such as nonaxisymetric nacelles, high-lift wings, engine intakes, or systems that combine external and internal flows. Modern computational fluid dynamics approaches may not encounter or engender these difficulties, and FENSAP-ICE is a combination of four modules forming a complete and generic in-flight icing simulation system, built in a way to solve successively impingement, ice accretion, heat loads, and performance degradation. The set of equations describing FENSAP-ICE's airflow solver, FENSAP, its impingement module, DROP3D, and its accretion module, ICE3D, are presented
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it