MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075549244 · doi:10.1115/imece2014-38373

Direct Contact Heating for Hot Forming Die Quenching

2014· article· en· W2075549244 on OpenAlex
J.N. Rasera, Kyle J. Daun, Mary D’Souza

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyCoatingDecarburizationBlankQuenching (fluorescence)BoronHot stampingAusteniteMonolithDie (integrated circuit)Ternary operationComposite materialMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most hot forming lines use slow, energy-intensive roller hearth furnaces to austenitize boron steel “blanks”. This paper describes an alternative heating technology in which blanks are austenitized by bringing them into contact with a hot monolith. The austenitizing temperature was reached in less than 30 seconds, and subsequent material characterization tests on oil-quenched blanks confirm that a fully martensitic structure is formed, and that the hardness and yield strength are comparable to furnace-treated samples. An Al-Si coating is typically used to prevent the oxidation and decarburization of the blanks within the furnace; preliminary tests found that the coating adheres to the monolith, impeding blank transfer and damaging the Al-Si-Fe ternary coating. Five interchangeable striking surfaces were assessed to see if they were less prone to adhering to the molten Al-Si coating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it