MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075555551 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2013.6706937

Dissimilarity space embedding of labeled graphs by a clustering-based compression procedure

2013· article· en· W2075555551 on OpenAlexaff
Lorenzo Livi, Filippo Maria Bianchi, Antonello Rizzi, Alireza Sadeghian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbeddingCluster analysisBenchmarkingComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)GraphSpace (punctuation)AlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose two variants of a general-purpose graph classification system which rely on a theoretical result that we prove in this paper. The result allows us to solve analytically the setting of a sequential clustering algorithm that is used for compressing the input labeled graphs represented in the dissimilarity space. As a consequence, we achieve a considerable asymptotic and practical speed-up of the overall classification system, maintaining state-of-the-art results in terms of test set classification accuracy on well-known benchmarking datasets of labeled graphs. The obtained speed-up makes the system one step closer towards the applicability to bigger labeled graphs and larger datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207