MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075559395 · doi:10.1142/s0218196706003396

A FAST ALGORITHM FOR STALLINGS' FOLDING PROCESS

2006· article· en· W2075559395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Algebra and Computation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolding (DSP implementation)Finitely-generated abelian groupProcess (computing)Group (periodic table)Word (group theory)Key (lock)Stallings theorem about ends of groups

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stalling's folding process is a key algorithm for solving algorithmic problems for finitely generated subgroups of free groups. Given a subgroup H = 〈J 1 ,…,J m 〉 of a finitely generated nonabelian free group F = F(x 1 ,…,x n ) the folding porcess enables one, for example, to solve the membership problem or compute the index [F : H]. We show that for a fixed free group F and an arbitrary finitely generated subgroup H (as given above) we can perform the Stallings' folding process in time O(N log *(N)), where N is the sum of the word lengths of the given generators of H.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it