MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075592087 · doi:10.1109/icc.2010.5502549

Adaptive Clock Skew Estimation with Interactive Multi-Model Kalman Filters for Sensor Networks

2010· article· en· W2075592087 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Yang, Jianping Pan, Lin Cai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTiming failureClock skewDigital clock managerComputer scienceClock synchronizationClock driftSynchronization (alternating current)Kalman filterSkewVector clockClock domain crossingOverhead (engineering)Self-clocking signalReal-time computingSynchronous circuitClock signalArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clock synchronization is a fundamental issue in communication networks and distributed systems, and clock skew is the inherent cause for clock desynchronization. Clock skew estimation is essential to improve the efficiency and reduce the overhead of clock synchronization schemes, and it is especially beneficial for resource-constrained devices such as sensor nodes in dynamic environments. According to the measurement, clock skew is environment sensitive, and no existing clock skew estimation schemes can accurately capture such dynamic behaviors. In this paper, we investigate a general clock synchronization problem with variable clock skews and propose a new skew estimation model based on a hybrid approach to characterizing the dynamic of clock skews. To estimate the time-varying clock state vector, we employ the Interactive Multi-Model (IMM) Kalman filter, which can make soft decisions by combining results from different models. Extensive simulations have been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive clock skew estimation algorithm, which achieves a better performance with moderate computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207