MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075593391 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014654

SPIRE spectroscopy of the prototypical Orion Bar photodissociation region

2010· article· en· W2075593391 on OpenAlexaff
E. Habart, E. Dartois, A. Abergel, J.‐P. Baluteau, D. A. Naylor, E. T. Polehampton, C. Joblin, P. A. R. Ade, L. D. Anderson, Paulo André, H. Arab, J.-P. Bernard, K. Blagrave, Sylvain Bontemps, F. Boulanger, Martin Cohen, M. Compiègne, P. Cox, G. R. Davis, R. J. Emery, T. Fulton, C. Gry, M. Huang, Scott C. Jones, J. M. Kirk, G. Lagache, T. Lim, S. C. Madden, G. Makiwa, P. G. Martin, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, S. Molinari, H. Moseley, F. Motte, K. Okumura, D. Pinheiro Gonçalves, J. A. Rodón, D. Russeil, P. Saraceno, S. Sidher, Locke D. Spencer, B. M. Swinyard, D. Ward–Thompson, G. J. White, A. Zavagno

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyImperial College LondonCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsIsotopologuePhotodissociationPhysicsBar (unit)Spire (mollusc)SpectroscopySpectral lineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsMolecular cloudTrace gasEmission spectrumAstrophysicsChemistryAstronomyPhotochemistryStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Aims. <i/>We present observations of the Orion Bar photodissociation region (PDR) obtained with the SPIRE instrument on-board <i>Herschel<i/>. <i>Methods. <i/>We obtained SPIRE Fourier-transform spectrometer (FTS) sparse sampled maps of the Orion bar.<i>Results. <i/>The FTS wavelength coverage and sensitivity allow us to detect a wealth of rotational lines of CO (and its isotopologues), fine structure lines of C and N<sup>+<sup/>, and emission lines from radicals and molecules such as CH<sup>+<sup/>, CH, H<sub>2<sub/>O or H<sub>2<sub/>S. For species detected from the ground, our estimates of the column densities agree with previously published values. The comparison between <sup>12<sup/>CO and <sup>13<sup/>CO maps shows particularly the effects of optical depth and excitation in the molecular cloud. The distribution of the <sup>12<sup/>CO and <sup>13<sup/>CO lines with upper energy levels indicates the presence of warm (~100–150 K) CO. This warm CO component is a significant fraction of the total molecular gas, confirming previous ground based studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207