Some Positive Developments for New Brunswick Pharmacists but New Generic Prices Still Causing Problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The New Brunswick government has provided pharmacists in the province with a measure of optimism about future levels of compensation, but in the short term, they continue to feel the pinch from lower generic pricing. The province announced in March that generic drug prices would decline to 40% of the brand-name price on June 1, 2012, and to 35% on December 1. While Health Minister Madeleine Dube did announce a reinvestment of some of the government's savings into pharmacy services, the New Brunswick Pharmacists' Association (NBPA) said the additional revenues would not adequately offset pharmacy's losses. The NBPA rolled out a public relations campaign against the new generic policy, which included full-page newspaper ads and letters to the editor. On May 25, Dube announced the first price decrease would be delayed until June 11, to give pharmacies an extra 10 days to reduce inventory purchased at lower prices. The government has also accepted the association's request to negotiate a formal compensation agreement—something New Brunswick pharmacists haven't had since 1995. In addition, pharmacy and the province will form a pharmacy affairs working group, tasked with monitoring savings from the new generic policy in the first year and developing frameworks for additional professional services. While the NBPA welcomes the commitment to a formal agreement and creation of the working group, it continues to have concerns, according to executive director Paul Blanchard. The slightly longer “washout” period for clearing old inventory isn't going to make much difference, he says. “Our members generally carry at least 60 days of inventory,” says Mr. Blanchard. “We were asking for a 30-day washout period, as several other provinces had negotiated. While 10 days is certainly better than nothing, it's inadequate and members are frustrated with that.” The government has agreed to begin negotiations on an agreement, but the process won't start until the summer of 2013, with the goal of finalizing terms by the end of that year. “We're struggling with the fact that we will have to wait a year before those negotiations can even begin,” the executive director says. “Our understanding is that the government wants to wait to have a sense of whether the policy is generating the savings they hope for.” “Our concern is that all of the risk is being absorbed by pharmacists,” he adds. “We're getting lower prices without the benefit of a new agreement. While there is an increase in our dispensing fees, it falls far short of what other provinces are getting.” Nova Scotia's fee, for example, has risen to $11.65, while the fee in New Brunswick has been raised to $10.40 per prescription. The NBPA is encouraged by the commitment to form the government-pharmacy working group, as it presents opportunities for establishing new reimbursed services, consistent with pharmacists' expanded scope of practice. “We'd like to see services such as immunization and minorailments prescribing dealt with through this group,” Mr. Blanchard says.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.094 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".