Service Temperature Characterization of Polytetrafluoroethylene-Based Gaskets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Gaskets based on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are used extensively in bolted flanged connections, especially in difficult chemical process plant applications where blowouts due to excessive bolt load loss are of major concem. The determination of their service temperatures requires the characterization of their short- and long-term creep relaxation resistance. An experiment-alanalytical procedure has been developed to determine a recommended service temperature for PTFE-based gaskets. Based on an improved version of the Hot Blowout Test (HOBT) in which thermal cycling has been incorporated, the procedure quantifies the short-term hot relaxation resistance, and the margin of safety against an in-service blowout. The improved HOBT test provides an excellent tool for the selection of blowout-resistant PTFE gaskets for difficult service. Currently, the procedure estimates the cooldown load loss due to the thermal contraction difference between the gasket and the flange, based on a rough estimate of the gasket thickness and the coefficient of thermal expansion and their vanation with temperature. The proposed procedure provides not only a better estimation of the gasket thickness but also accounts for thermal ratcheting and the temperature lag between flange and bolts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".