MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075614099 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.5348

Le pouvoir des savoirs : enjeux et impacts des concepts sur le développement rural pour le Sahel nigérien

2008· article· fr· W2075614099 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mehdi Saqalli

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article présente dans le cas du Niger un état des lieux des conceptions des acteurs de développement. Face à un monde rural en plein bouleversement, les opérateurs intègrent difficilement les évolutions des paradigmes sur le développement rural : un raisonnement malthusien, combiné à une conception des villages comme des systèmes fermés et des stéréotypes sur les modes d’organisation des familles favorisent une représentation des communautés qui limite de fait la palette, l’ampleur et l’impact réel des actions. Pourtant, les modes d’enquête, comme les protocoles de négociation et de répartition des pouvoirs existent et sont proposés. La famine de 2004-2005 a illustré l'écart entre objectifs affichés et pratiques par la difficulté d’élaborer des outils d’action au-delà du volet diagnostic. L'article s'achève par un plaidoyer pour assumer le volet politique inhérent à toute action de développement local.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207