Investigation of an externally restrained concrete bridge deck slab on a multi-girder bridge model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The steel-free bridge deck system is an innovative solution in which the concrete deck slab is externally restrained by a series of steel straps. The ultimate strength characteristics of externally reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs were investigated in this paper. A 1/3 scale experimental model of a bridge with six girders was constructed for the study. This was the first known set of test results on a bridge model with more than four girders. A single point load, simulating the dual tire print of the CHBDC design truck, was applied at various locations on the deck and loading increased until punching failure occurred. The influence of different parameters including transverse diaphragms, proximity for the load to restraint straps, residual strength after strap removal, and simultaneous application of wheel loads in adjacent panels of the deck was tested to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the resistance of this deck system. The testing results confirmed that the interior panels of the deck have inherently higher punching resistance than the exterior panels. Most significantly, the study provided significant statistical data on the punching resistance of these deck slabs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".