MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075670093 · doi:10.1139/p00-051

Time-dependent angular and energy distributions of sputtered copper atoms

2000· article· en· W2075670093 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSputteringPhysicsAtomic physicsIonCopperAtom (system on chip)Atomic numberYield (engineering)TrimAtomic massEnergy (signal processing)Amorphous solidMass numberEnergetic neutral atomCollisionNuclear physicsThin filmNeutronMaterials scienceCrystallographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time reference was introduced in the TRIM computer simulation code without changing the "event-driven" logic of the program. The code was applied to model the atomic collision cascades and sputtering of amorphous copper targets caused by bombardment of keV ions of different masses (Be, Ne, Ar, Cu, Xe, Au). Time-dependent characteristics of ion-induced processes such as mean number and energy of moving target atoms, number of collisions and vacancies (or) recoils created, sputtering yield, mean energy and angle of ejection of sputtered atoms were obtained, and their dependence on the ion/atom mass ratio is discussed. PACS No.: 79.20-m

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it