Synaptic Enhancement Induced Through Callosal Pathways in Cat Association Cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The corpus callosum plays a major role in synchronizing neocortical activities in the two hemispheres. We investigated the changes in callosally elicited excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) of neurons from cortical association areas 5 and 7 of cats under barbiturate or ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. Single pulses to callosal pathway evoked control EPSPs; pulse-trains were subsequently applied at different frequencies to homotopic sites in the contralateral cortex, as conditioning stimulation; thereafter, the single pulses were applied again to test changes in synaptic responsiveness by comparing the amplitudes of control and conditioned EPSPs. In 41 of 42 neurons recorded under barbiturate anesthesia, all frequencies of conditioning callosal stimuli induced short-term (5-30 min) enhancement of test EPSPs elicited by single stimuli. Neurons tested with successive conditioning pulse-trains at different frequencies displayed stronger enhancement with high-frequency (40-100 Hz) than with low-frequency (10-20 Hz) rhythmic pulse-trains; >100 Hz, the potentiation saturated. In a neuronal sample, microdialysis of an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blocker in barbiturate-treated cats suppressed this potentiation, and potentiation of callosally evoked EPSPs was not detected in neurons recorded under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia, thus indicating that EPSPs' potentiation implicates, at least partially, NMDA receptors. These data suggest that callosal activities occurring within low-frequency and fast-frequency oscillations play a role in cortical synaptic plasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".