MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporal Epileptogenesis: Localizing Value of Scalp and Subdural Interictal and Ictal EEG Data

2001· article· en· W2075697963 on OpenAlexaff
Warren T. Blume, Giannina M. Holloway, Samuel Wiebe

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpileptogenesisIctalTemporal lobeElectroencephalographyEpilepsyScalpMedicinePsychologyAnesthesiaSurgeryNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine the value of scalp epileptiform EEG data and subdural interictal spikes in localizing temporal epileptogenesis among patients requiring invasive recordings. For this delineation, we related such factors to site of subdural seizure origin in 27 consecutive patients. METHODS: Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy whose non-invasive lateralizing data were inconclusive and therefore required subdural electroencephalography were studied. All patients had (a) 24-h scalp telemetered EEGs, (b) adequate bitemporal subdural placements with an inferomesial line extending from a posterior burr hole anteriorly to <2.5 cm from anterior uncus and a lateral line reaching within 2.5 cm of the temporal tip, and (c) > or =2 subdurally recorded seizures. RESULTS: Three hundred one (96%) of 314 subdurally recorded clinical seizures involving all 27 patients arose from a discrete focus; 266 (85%) arose from mesial temporal regions, which was the origin of the majority of seizures in 24 (89%) patients. The majority of subdural seizures arose ipsilateral to the majority of scalp EEG spikes in 22 (81%) of 27, and most subdural seizures of 15 (75%) of 20 arose ipsilateral to scalp seizures. Lateralization of interictal subdural spikes correlated with that of subdural seizures in 74-92% of patients, depending on the method of spike compilation: for example, most subdural seizures arose from the same lobe of most consistent principal temporal spikes in 92% of patients. These indices of epileptogenesis also appeared more commonly on the side of effective (> or =90% improvement) temporal lobectomy than contralaterally in the following proportions: most consistent principal subdural spikes, 86% of patients ipsilateral vs. 9% contralateral; scalp-recorded clinical seizures, 55% vs. 18%; scalp EEG spikes, 45% vs. 9%. CONCLUSIONS: Even among patients whose scalp data are sufficiently complex to require invasive recording for clarification, lateralization of temporal scalp interictal and ictal epileptiform activity and subdural interictal spikes should be included when assessing the side of temporal epileptogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207