Land-fast ice microalgal and phytoplanktonic communities (Adélie Land, Antarctica) in relation to environmental factors during ice break-up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annual land-fast ice, particularly an unconsolidated layer or “platelet ice-like” layer (PLI), was sampled in spring 1995 to study the spatial and short-term variations of ice-associated diatoms. Under-ice water, a lead and small polynyas were also sampled. Along a 7 km seaward transect a geographical gradient was evident, with some rare diatom species present only in the offshore PLI, whereas others (mainly pennate diatoms) were ubiquitous. The dense microphytic PLI community as well as the phytoplankton was diatom-dominated, but, within these two communities, marked differences appeared. First, the sea-ice communities (PLI and solid bottom ice) were moderately diverse (36 species), mostly composed of pennate diatoms, of which many were chain forming or tube-dwelling. Dominant taxa were Navicula glaciei, Berkeleya adeliensis, Nitzschia stellata, Amphiprora kufferathii and Nitzschia lecointei. Some differences in the distribution of the most dominant species appeared within the bottom ice and the PLI, attesting to differences in the origin or/and growing capability of these diatoms in these two ice compartments. Under-ice water species composition was mixed with sea-ice communities only on the most coastal sites and during ice melt. Maximum cell numbers were mostly noticed in the PLI, reaching up to 1010 cells l−1 and very high Chl a concentrations (exceptionally up to 9.8 mg Chl a l−1 or 1.9 g Chl a m−2, from a 10 to 20 cm thick PLI layer, close to the continent). Secondly, the phytoplankton in the lead and small polynyas had a low diversity, very low standing stocks (on an average 0.69 μg Chl a l−1) and cell densities (2 × 104 cells l−1). Some species from the polynyas were similar to those of the PLI, such as Navicula glaciei, but others were typically planktonic, such as Chaetoceros cf. neglectus. The presence of encysted cells (Chaetoceros and Chrysophytes) was also noticeable in the polynya water. In early spring no seeding process was obvious from the PLI to polynya water. A comparison with similar fast-ice diatom communities in other parts of coastal Antarctica, is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".