MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075702100 · doi:10.1080/13530190500281622

A: Reviews: History

2005· article· en· W2075702100 on OpenAlex
Edward J. Keall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Middle Eastern Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTurkey's Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourIslamTheologyHistoryMedia studiesAncient historySociologyLawPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. Nur Bilge Criss, ‘Review of Turkey: Facing a New Millennium: Coping with Intertwined Conflicts’, Turkish Studies 5 (2004), pp. 147–151. 10. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 64. 1. See Clare Murphy, Jordan's dilemma over honour killings, BBC News Online, (10 August 2003) p. 2 1. Marriage on Trial: A Study of Islamic Family Law: Iran and Morocco Compared (London: I.B. Tauris, 1983). 11. (London: I.B. Tauris), p.67. 2. See Dr. Bhaskar Dasgupta, No Honour In Honour Killings, Hindustan Times, (21 February 2004) p. 3 2. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 19. 3. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 250. 4. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 231. 5. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 264. 6. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 165, 7. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 94. 8. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 57. 9. (London: I.B. Tauris), p. 62.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it