MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075716976 · doi:10.1115/icnmm2009-82289

Simulation of Flow Control in Microchannels Using Ferrofluid Plugs

2009· article· en· W2075716976 on OpenAlexaff
Akshay C. Gunde, Sushanta K. Mitra

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2009 7th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerrofluidMicrochannelMicrofluidicsMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldFlow control (data)Fluid dynamicsSpark plugMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Microelectromechanical systemsMechanical engineeringComputer scienceNanotechnologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microfluidic devices have acquired an important position in the field of MEMS. While the usage of mechanical components for achieving electroosmosis and electrophoresis effects can prove to be impractical and costly, alternative methods for flow control have to be explored. This paper extends the concept of obtaining a superior flow control in microchannels by using ferrofluid plugs as barriers. These plugs occlude and discharge fluid flow, thereby functioning as valves and rendering the usage of mechanical components unnecessary. A numerical simulation of a ferrofluid plug blocking fluid flow in a microchannel due to the action of a magnetic field is carried out. The relationship between ferrofluid property and the capacity to block fluid flow is studied and analyzed. Thus a new concept of flow control in a microfluidic device by the proper variation of the external magnetic field and positioning of the ferrofluid plugs has been introduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2009 7th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and MinichannelsSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207