MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075728937 · doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0075

Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy, Second Edition

2011· review· en· W2075728937 on OpenAlexaff
Helen K. Li, Mark Horton, Sven–Erik Bursell, Jerry D. Cavallerano, Ingrid Zimmer-Galler, Mathew Tennant, Michael D. Abràmoff, Edward Chaum, Delia Cabrera DeBuc, Tom Leonard-Martin, Marc Winchester

Bibliographic record

VenueTelemedicine Journal and e-Health · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsTelemedicineTelehealthStatutory lawDiabetic retinopathyQuality (philosophy)MedicineMatching (statistics)Key (lock)Medical emergencyMedical educationNursingHealth careComputer sciencePolitical scienceDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Second Edition Editorial Committee: Helen K. Li, MD (Chair), Mark Horton, OD, MD (Co-chair), Sven-Erik Bursell, PhD, Jerry Cavallerano, OD, PhD, Ingrid Zimmer-Galler, MD, Mathew Tennant, MD Writing Committees: Clinical: Jerry Cavallerano, OD, PhD (Chair), Ingrid Zimmer-Galler, MD Technology: Sven-Erik Bursell, PhD (Chair), Michael Abramoff, MD, PhD, Edward Chaum, MD, PhD, Debra Cabrera DeBuc, PhD Operations: Mark Horton, OD, MD (Chair), Helen K. Li, MD, Tom Leonard-Martin, PhD, MPH, Mathew Tennant, MD, Marc Winchester, BA Other Contributors: Reviewers [R], ATA Standard and Guidelines Committee Members [SG], ATA Staff [S] Nina Antoniotti, RN, MBA, PhD [Chair, SG] Jordana Bernard, MBA [S] David Brennan, MSBE [SG] Anne Burdick, MD, MPH [SG] Jerry Cavallerano, OD, PhD [SG] Brian Grady, MD [SG] Tom Hirota, DO [SG] Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD [Vice Chair, SG] Cindy K. Leenknecht, MS, APRN-CS, CCRP [SG] Jonathan Linkous, MPA [S] Lou Theurer [SG] Jill Winters, PhD, RN [SG] First Edition American Telemedicine Association, Ocular Telehealth Special Interest Group, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Working Group American Telemedicine Association Executive Committee: Jonathan D. Linkous, Richard Bakalar, MD, Adam Darkins, MD, Col. Ronald K. Poropatich, MD American Telemedicine Association Ocular Telehealth Special Interest Group: Jerry Cavallerano, OD, PhD (Chair), Mary G. Lawrence, MD, M.P.H. (Vice Chair) Editorial Committee: Helen K. Li, MD (Co-chair), Mathew Tennant, MD (Co-chair), Sven Bursell, PhD, Jerry Cavallerano, OD, PhD, Mark Horton, OD, MD, Richard Bakalar, MD Writing Committees: Clinical: Jerry Cavallerano, OD, PhD (Chair), Mary G. Lawrence, MD, MPH, Ingrid Zimmer-Galler, MD, COL Wendall Bauman, MD Technology: Sven Bursell, PhD (Chair), W. Kelly Gardner Operations: Mark Horton, OD, MD (Chair), Lloyd Hildebrand, MD, Jay Federman, MD National Institute of Standards and Technology: Lisa Carnahan Veterans Administration: Peter Kuzmak, John M. Peters, Adam Darkins, MD At Large Group Participants: Jehanara Ahmed, MD, Lloyd M. Aiello, MD, Lloyd P. Aiello, MD, PhD, Gary Buck, Ying Ling Chen, PhD, Denise Cunningham, CRA, RBP, M.Ed., Eric Goodall, Ned Hope, Eugene Huang, PhD, Larry Hubbard, MAT, Mark Janczewski, MD, J.W.L. Lewis, PhD, Hiro Matsuzaki, COL Francis L. McVeigh, OD, Jordana Motzno, Diane Parker-Taillon, Robert Read, Peter Soliz, PhD, Bernard Szirth, PhD, COL Robert A. Vigersky, MD, COL Thomas Ward, MD American Telemedicine Association Administrative Contributor: Catherine Diver Table of Contents 1. PREAMBLE 2. INTRODUCTION 3. BACKGROUND a. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study b. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study c. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications d. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study e. The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network 4. PRINCIPLES OF A TELEHEALTH DR PROGRAM a. Mission b. Vision c. Goals d. Guiding Principles 5. ETHICS 6. CLINICAL VALIDATION a. Category 1 b. Category 2 c. Category 3 d. Category 4 7. COMMUNICATION 8. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS a. Medical Care Supervision b. Patient Care Coordinator c. Image Acquisition d. Image Review and Evaluation e. Information Systems 9. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS a. Interoperability b. Image Acquisition c. Compression d. Data Communication and Transmission e. Computer Display f. Archiving and Retrieval g. Security h. Reliability and Redundancy i. Documentation j. Image Analysis 10. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS a. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act b. Privileging and Credentialing c. Stark Act and Self-Referrals d. State Medical Practice Acts/Licensure e. Tort Liability f. Duty g. Standards of Care h. Consent 11. QUALITY CONTROL 12. OPERATIONS 13. CUSTOMER SUPPORT a. Originating Site b. Transmission c. Distant Site 14. FINANCIAL FACTORS a. Reimbursement b. Grants c. Federal Programs d. Other Financial Factors e. Equipment Cost 15. SUMMARY REFERENCES APPENDIX 1. Interoperability 2. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Metadata 3. Computer-Aided Detection 4. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 5. Privileging and Credentialing 6. Quality Control 7. Operational Specifications 8. Customer Support 9. Reimbursement ABBREVIATIONS GLOSSARY

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0090.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTelemedicine Journal and e-HealthSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207