MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075732665 · doi:10.7202/036084ar

Roquentin et les types sans importance sociale

2006· article· fr· W2075732665 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Benoît Denis

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes françaises · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Nausée expose la découverte que fait Antoine Roquentin de la contingence fondamentale de l'existence. Cette notion philosophique, qui se veut universelle, se trouve pourtant interrogée dans le roman à travers le prisme d'une catégorie sociologique curieuse, celle des « types sans importance sociale », dont le meilleur représentant est le personnage de l'Autodidacte. La présence de ce groupe social étrange et mal défini peut être rapportée, et par là mieux comprise, à un intertexte romanesque de l'entre-deux-guerres qui va, grosso modo, de Duhamel à Camus : y apparaît un personnage paradoxal, incarnation à la fois pathétique et héroïque d'une médiocritié sociologique et par suite existentielle, qui a tous les traits du type sans importance sociale. A la fois ridicule et sublime, il voit en dernière instance le drame de son existence se condenser sur la problématique de l'autodidaxie : redevable d'une expérience existentielle ultime, il est de quelque manière incapable de communiquer dans les formes requises la vision du monde qui en découle. Et tout se passe dans La Nausée comme si Roquentin prêtait sa voix à cette masse informe et aphasique des types sans importance sociale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.023
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes françaisesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207