MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical and MRI Predictors of Outcome After Surgical Intervention for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

2007· article· en· W2075737732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroimaging · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalToronto Western HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntramedullary rodMagnetic resonance imagingAbnormalityMyelopathyContext (archaeology)RadiologySpinal cordCordRetrospective cohort studySurgeryDecompression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older individuals. Controversy remains in terms of the optimal timing and indications for surgical intervention. In this context, it would be of benefit to define clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predictors of outcome after intervention for CSM. OBJECTIVE: We studied subjects with clinically documented cervical myelopathy to evaluate the relationship among preoperative MRI signal change, clinical findings, and outcome after surgical intervention. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case study of 76 CSM patients who underwent cervical decompressive surgery and who had pre- and postoperative MRI studies available for review. Preoperative clinical findings and MRI abnormalities on T1- (T1WI) and T2-weighted (T2WI) images were correlated with outcomes (Nurick scores; Odom's criteria) following surgical intervention. Postoperative MRIs were performed 2-4 months postsurgery to assess for adequacy of decompression and resolution of preoperative signal changes. The pattern of spinal cord signal intensity was classified as: Group A (MRI N/N), no intramedullary signal intensity abnormality on T1WI or T2WI; Group B (MRI N/Hi), no intramedullary signal intensity abnormality on T1WI and high intramedullary signal intensity on T2WI; Group C (MRI Lo/Hi), low intensity intramedullary signal abnormality on T1WI and high intensity intramedullary signal abnormality on T2WI. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (version 8.2). RESULTS: We evaluated 76 patients (57% males, mean age 62 years, range 30-89) who experienced preoperative symptoms for an average of 6.5 months (range 1 month to 9 years). Preoperative MRI studies demonstrated the following: Group A (MRI N/N) = 45; Group B (MRI N/Hi) = 23; and Group C (MRI Lo/Hi) = 8. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 2.5 years (range 2 months to 8.5 years). A positive Babinski sign and the presence of intrinsic hand muscle atrophy showed the greatest association with abnormal preoperative MRI signal change. High preoperative Nurick score, clonus, and leg spasticity were associated with a less favorable postoperative outcome. In Group B (MRI N/Hi), 11/23 (52.17%) patients had recovery to MRI N/N (P < .0001) at their follow-up scan. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high intramedullary signal change on T2WI who do not have clonus or spasticity may experience a good surgical outcome and may have reversal of the MRI abnormality. A less favorable surgical outcome is predicted by the presence of low intramedullary signal on T1WI, clonus, or spasticity. These data suggest that there may be a window of opportunity to obtain optimal surgical outcomes in patients with CSM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it