MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075765532 · doi:10.1090/noti1064

Infrastructure: Structure Inside the Class Group of a Real Quadratic Field

2013· article· en· W2075765532 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Jacobson, Renate Scheidler

Bibliographic record

VenueNotices of the American Mathematical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)Quadratic equationClass (philosophy)Field (mathematics)MathematicsPure mathematicsComputer scienceCombinatoricsPhysicsGeometryArtificial intelligenceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cows and Fields Suppose that you are a wise ancient Greek, and that you have been given the task of counting the Sun God’s cattle on the island of Sicily. They are too numerous to count manually, and your only clue is a puzzle that relates the number of cows and bulls of a particular color to those of another. How can you determine the size of your herd from such cryptic information? A precise version of this numerical puzzle is the well-known cattle problem of Archimedes [2]. A number of accounts of its solution appear in the literature [31, 21, 19]. Unfortunately for the hypothetical Greek sage, this problem does not have a small and completely elementary solution— it would take more than 2,000 years before the first solution was discovered by Amthor [1]. Had a solution been available, the Greek would likely have been shocked to find that the Sun God had somehow managed to pack a herd of more than 10206544 animals onto Sicily! One of the main ingredients in Amthor’s solution was solving the Diophantine equation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotices of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207