MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075771715 · doi:10.1002/jcc.10406

Performance of the Harris functional for extended basis sets at the Hartree–Fock and density functional levels

2004· article· en· W2075771715 on OpenAlexaff
John M. Cullen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy functionalDensity functional theoryBasis setHybrid functionalBasis (linear algebra)Hartree–Fock methodKohn–Sham equationsOpen shellOrbital-free density functional theoryHartreePolarization (electrochemistry)Computational chemistryQuantum mechanicsChemistryStatistical physicsPhysicsMathematicsGeometryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Harris functional is a noniterative variational procedure that uses an input charge density to produce an energy that is surprisingly accurate compared to the converged Kohn-Sham self-consistent result. We adapted and generalized this functional for the Hartree-Fock closed- and open-shell cases as well as examined its use for hybrid density functional methods such as B3LYP. Analysis of extended basis set calculations shows that at the B3LYP level an input density formed from a double zeta + polarization orbital basis is accurate enough to reproduce the energy of triple zeta + double polarization + diffuse orbital basis. For large molecules this translates into a computational speed that can be an order of magnitude faster. In the case of Hartree-Fock calculations a "bootstrapping technique" that employs successive applications of the Harris functional can further reduce computational times while retaining sufficient accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207