MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075787909 · doi:10.3917/ripc.191.0095

Structurer la comparaison par l'expérience de l'écriture

2012· article· fr· W2075787909 on OpenAlexaffabout
Colin Giraud

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale de politique comparée · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Parks and Wilderness Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Cet article porte sur les enjeux d’écriture d’un manuscrit de recherche ayant trait au rôle des populations homosexuelles masculines dans les processus de gentrification à Paris et à Montréal. Il montre comment l’écriture modifie et définit progressivement elle-même les cadres, les termes et les enjeux de la comparaison. En décrivant les étapes et les incertitudes de la démarche comparative, on comprend le rôle décisif de la mise en forme des données dans la définition des modalités et des termes de la comparaison. L’étape de la définition d’un plan d’écriture et certains passages de l’analyse du matériau empirique montrent combien les techniques d’écriture les plus formelles révèlent en réalité des enjeux de contenu beaucoup plus cruciaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale de politique comparéeSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207