MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075824021 · doi:10.1080/0144361031000119466

Emergency obstetric hysterectomy

2003· article· en· W2075824021 on OpenAlexaff
T.F. Baskett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
KeywordsMedicineHysterectomyObstetricsIncidence (geometry)Postpartum haemorrhageBlood transfusionCaesarean deliveryUterine atonyPopulationVaginal deliveryCaesarean sectionGynecologyPregnancySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A population-based review (1988-2000) of 142,634 deliveries found an incidence of emergency obstetric hysterectomy of 0.53 per 1000 deliveries. The relative risk for caesarean versus vaginal delivery was 18.32 (10.26, 32.71) P<0.001. Previous caesarean delivery occurred in 47.4% and 22.4% were primiparous. Causes and morbidity were ascertained in a hospital-based study (1980-2001) of 64 emergency hysterectomies in 110,537 deliveries. The main indications for hysterectomy were abnormal placentation (50%) and atonic postpartum haemorrhage (32.8%). Blood transfusion was needed in 84.4% and intensive care in 26.6%. There were no maternal deaths. Potential alternatives to hysterectomy for massive obstetric haemorrhage are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and GynaecologySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207