MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075839714 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2012.6503402

Availability analysis of cloud computing centers

2012· article· en· W2075839714 on OpenAlex
Hamzeh Khazaei, Jelena Mišić, Vojislav B. Mišić, Nasim Beigi Mohammadi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceKey (lock)Blocking (statistics)Task (project management)Quality of serviceDistributed computingData centerCapacity planningComputer networkComputer securityOperating systemSystems engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate availability and performance analysis are important requirements to guarantee quality of services (QoS) for cloud users. In this paper, we integrate an availability model in overall analytical sub-models of cloud system. Each sub-model captures a specific aspect of cloud centers. The key performance metrics such as task blocking probability and total delay incurred on user tasks are obtained. Our results can be used by an admission control to prevent the cloud center from entering unstable regime of operation. The results also reveal practical insights into capacity planning for cloud computing centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207