MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075852320 · doi:10.1021/jp0733668

The Influence of Urea and Trimethylamine-<i>N</i>-oxide on Hydrophobic Interactions

2007· letter· en· W2075852320 on OpenAlexaff
Sandip Paul, G. N. Patey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUreaTrimethylamine N-oxideTrimethylamineChemistryAqueous solutionHydrophobic effectNeopentaneAttractionMolecular dynamicsOxideMoleculeChemical physicsInorganic chemistryComputational chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular dynamics simulations are used to obtain potentials of mean force for pairs of neopentane molecules immersed in aqueous solutions containing urea, trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), or both solutes at once. It is shown that the hydrophobic attraction acting between neopentane pairs in pure water and in water-urea solution is completely destroyed by the addition of TMAO. This strongly suggests that TMAO does not counter the protein denaturing effect of urea by enhancing hydrophobic attraction amongst nonpolar groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207