MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075900076 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2002.86.12.1396

Biplot Analysis of Host-by-Pathogen Data

2002· article· en· W2075900076 on OpenAlexaff
Weikai Yan, D. E. Falk

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetics and Plant Breeding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiplotGenotypeBiologyHost (biology)PathogenStrain (injury)VirulenceGeneticsComputational biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective breeding for disease resistance relies on a thorough understanding of host-by-pathogen relations. Achieving such understanding can be difficult and challenging, particularly for large data sets with complex host genotype-by-pathogen strain interactions. This paper presents a biplot approach that facilitates visual analysis of host-by-pathogen data. A biplot displays both host genotypes and pathogen isolates in a single scatter plot; each genotype or isolate is displayed as a point defined by its scores on the first two principal components derived from subjecting genotype- or strain-centered data to singular value decomposition. From a biplot, clusters of host genotypes and clusters of pathogen strains can be simultaneously visualized. Moreover, the basis for genotype and strain classifications, i.e., interactions between individual genotypes and strains, can be visualized at the same time. A biplot based on genotype-centered data and that based on strain-centered data are appropriate for visual evaluation of susceptibility/resistance of genotypes and virulence/avirulence of strains, respectively. Biplot analysis of genotype-by-strain is illustrated with published response scores of 13 barley line groups to 8 net blotch isolate groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.117 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicGenetics and Plant BreedingFrench-language works237,207