MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The search for the origin of rhythmicity in intestinal contraction; from tissue to single cells

2000· review· en· W2075928317 on OpenAlexaff
Huizinga, Robinson, Lars Lykke Thomsen

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurogastroenterology & Motility · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterstitial cell of CajalPeristalsisElectrophysiologyBiologyImmunohistochemistryReverse transcriptaseAnatomyRhythmCell biologyContraction (grammar)Messenger RNAPathologyNeurosciencePolymerase chain reactionInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyImmunologyGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than a century ago, rhythmic propulsive contractile activity was observed in the intestine after blockade of nerve conduction, thus demonstrating a form of peristalsis that appeared to be under myogenic control. During this century, light and electron microscopic investigations provided the hypothesis that interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) could be the cells of origin for this rhythmicity. In recent years, physiological studies demonstrated a link between the presence of electrical slow wave activity and the presence of ICC. The recognition that the ICC cell membrane harbours the Kit protein sparked rapid advancement in ICC research, and has been essential in the identification of ICC in tissue and in culture through Kit immunohistochemistry and kit mRNA reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). With these techniques, electrophysiology was carried out on positively identified single ICC in culture. These methods revealed that single ICC generate spontaneous rhythmic inward currents and slow waves in membrane potential, thus providing strong evidence that ICC generate the electrical pacemaker activity for the gut musculature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurogastroenterology & MotilitySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207