MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Technique of Venting the Femoral Canal

2004· article· en· W2075938908 on OpenAlexaff
David Stephen

Bibliographic record

VenueTechniques in Orthopaedics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntramedullary rodMedicineFemoral canalFemurDiaphysisFat embolismSurgeryNail (fastener)Femoral shaftFemoral fractureComplicationRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The preferred method of stabilization for an impending or actual pathologic fracture of the femoral diaphysis is an intramedullary nail. Unfortunately, cardiopulmonary abnormalities can occur during or after the nail insertion and are recognized as a potentially fatal but preventable complication. Although numerous management modalities are implemented before, during, and after nailing, no single strategy can eliminate the occurrence of fat embolism. One technique that can be used to decrease the incidence of fat emboli is distal venting, either in the case of the intact femur or in cases of fracture proximal to the isthmus of the femoral canal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechniques in OrthopaedicsSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207