MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075963766 · doi:10.1109/ainaw.2007.88

An Investigation of Chip-Level Hardware Support for Web Mining

2007· article· en· W2075963766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayEmbedded systemSoftwareComputer hardwareHardware architectureHardware compatibility listSystem on a chipAbstractionComputer architectureChipOpen source hardwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we investigate the use of hardware at the chip level to support some fundamental Web mining operations. Both software and hardware versions of the same operators are implemented on field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). The software versions are executed on a soft IP core on the same FPGA chip as the hardware implementation, ensuring their fair performance comparison. The hardware operators are structured hierarchically following the bottom-up and platform-based design strategies. These design approaches provide the opportunity to measure the performance of the respective hardware and software operators at various levels of abstraction. Our proof of concept investigation has shown that with the proper system-level design strategies, there is a tremendous potential in hardware support at the chip level for information retrieval and Web mining operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWeb Data Mining and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207