MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075992614 · doi:10.1115/sbc2012-80509

CFD Challenge: Solutions Using the In-House Finite-Element-Based Solver NEWTETR

2012· article· en· W2075992614 on OpenAlexaff
Yiemeng Hoi, David A. Steinman

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulsatile flowSolverComputational fluid dynamicsFinite element methodMechanicsInletSteady state (chemistry)Flow (mathematics)Sensitivity (control systems)Pressure dropMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)Computer scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamicsEngineeringElectronic engineeringChemistryMedicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Briefly, this Challenge aims to test the sensitivity of steady and pulsatile pressure drops as predicted by different CFD solvers or groups, and ultimately against in vitro pressure measurements. The current study focuses on the Phase I of the Challenge. We simulated steady state and pulsatile pressure drops based on the nominal surface geometry and specific inlet flow rates on a giant cerebral aneurysm with proximal stenosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and BSame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207