MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076000850 · doi:10.1159/000242611

Effect of Phenobarbital on Cerebral Blood Flow in the Newborn Piglet under Stress

2009· article· en· W2076000850 on OpenAlexaff
N Laudignon, Sylvain Chemtob, Kay D. Beharry, J Rex, Jacob V. Aranda

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenobarbitalCerebral blood flowMedicineAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heart rate, cardiac output, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), and cerebral blood flow (CBF) were measured in 12 newborn piglets (6 controls and 6 pretreated with 20 mg/kg phenobarbital), under two different stresses: pain stimulation and intravenous injection of 2.5 mg/kg phenylephrine. Phenobarbital prevented pain-induced tachycardia (p less than 0.05 versus controls) but failed to prevent hemodynamic changes induced by phenylephrine. CBF remained relatively constant throughout the study. A better correlation between cerebral vascular resistance and MABP was noted in the phenobarbital group (r = 0.58, p less than 0.01) than in the controls (r = 0.15, p = NS), suggesting that phenobarbital potentiates the vasoconstrictor effect of catecholamines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207