MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076052035 · doi:10.1159/000232549

Influence of Pregnancy on the Immune Response to Ragweed Antigen in Rats

2009· article· en· W2076052035 on OpenAlexaff
H.M. Vijay, H.S. Buttare, G. Lavergne

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRagweedPregnancyConcanavalin AGestationImmunoglobulin ESpleenImmune systemImmunologyEndocrinologyAntibodyInternal medicineAntibody responseAntigenBiologyMedicineAllergyIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reactivity of spleen lymphocytes in culture and the reaginic antibody (IgE) response to nondialyzable water-soluble ragweed (DWSR) extract were assessed at different intervals of pregnancy in rats. On day 6 of pregnancy, spleen cells showed a significant reduction in their mitogenic response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and slightly lowered response to concanavalin A (Con A) when compared to that of control nonpregnant rats. On day 11 of pregnancy, values obtained with PHA were slightly lower and those obtained with Con A similar to those of control rats. However, at day 18 of gestation, PHA values also returned to normal levels. In contrast, IgE antibody response to DWSR from day 4 to 9 of pregnancy was either slightly enhanced or similar to that of control rats and significantly suppressed from day 11 to 18 of gestation. The decline in humoral response to DWSR during late pregnancy is discussed in the text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied ImmunologySame topicAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFrench-language works237,207