Synthesis of thioether derivatives of brominated poly(isobutylene‐<i>co</i>‐isoprene): Direct coupling chemistry for silica reinforcement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thioether derivatives of brominated poly(isobutylene‐co‐isoprene) (BIIR) were prepared through base‐mediated nucleophilic substitution reactions of the elastomer with thiolate ions formed in situ from thiols. The characterization of the reaction products was accomplished with studies of a model compound, brominated 2,2,4,8,8‐pentamethyl‐4‐nonene, the reactivity of which was shown to be consistent with that of the polymer. The reaction of aliphatic thiols with the allylic bromide functionality of BIIR required a strong base, and base‐catalyzed air oxidation of the thiol to disulfide operated concurrently to reduce the yield of the desired substitution products. An efficient and direct method of coupling BIIR to silica with (3‐mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane improved filler dispersion, thereby overcoming problematic agglomeration of reinforcing siliceous fillers in these compounds. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 2937–2944, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".