MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076079261 · doi:10.1002/marc.200300098

Living Ring‐Opening Metathesis Polymerization of Norbornenes Containing Acetyl‐Protected Carbohydrates Using Well‐Defined Molybdenum and Ruthenium Initiators

2004· article· en· W2076079261 on OpenAlexaff
Kotohiro Nomura, Ichiro Sakai, Yukio Imanishi, Michiya Fujiki, Yoshitaka Miyamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsNorthern Alberta Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorborneneRutheniumPolymer chemistryPolymerizationMetathesisMolybdenumRing-opening metathesis polymerisationCopolymerPolymerChemistryMaltoseRing-opening polymerizationOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Summary: Homopolymers and diblock copolymers that contain maltose or glucose residues have been prepared by ring‐opening metathesis polymerization of norbornene derivatives using a molybdenum–alkylidene initiator, Mo(CHCMe2Ph)(N‐2,6‐iPr2C6H3)(OtBu)2 (A). These polymerizations took place not only in a living fashion ($\overline M _{\rm w} /\overline M _{\rm n}$ = < 1.2) but also with almost quantitative initiation. Two types of ruthenium initiators, (Cy3P)2RuCl2(CHPh) (B) and (IMesH2)(Cy3P)RuCl2(CHPh) (C), have also been used to compare initiator performance under the same conditions. Structures for the polymers studied here. image Structures for the polymers studied here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Rapid CommunicationsSame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207