MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076110297 · doi:10.1017/s0308210500001116

Limiting profiles for periodic solutions of scalar delay differential equations

2001· article· en· W2076110297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingMathematicsScalar (mathematics)PhysicsDelay differential equationDifferential equationMathematical analysisMathematical physicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let f (·, λ) : R→R be given so that f (0, λ) = 0 and f ( x , λ) = (1 + λ) x + ax 2 + bx 3 + o ( x 3 ) as x → 0. We characterize those small values of ε > 0 and λ ∈ R for which there are periodic solutions of periods approximately 1/ k with k ∈ N of the delay equations When a = 0, these periodic solutions approach square waves if b < 0 or pulses if b > 0 as ε → 0. These results are similar to those obtained by Chow et al. and Hale and Huang, where the case of f ( x , λ) = −(1 + λ) x + ax 2 + bx 3 + o ( x 3 ) as x → 0 is considered. However, when a ≠ 0, all these periodic solutions approach pulses as ε → 0; an interesting phenomenon that cannot happen in the case considered by Chow et al. and Hale and Huang.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it