Highly tunable nanoscale metal-insulator-metal split ring core ring resonators (SRCRRs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A class of nano-scale wavelength-selective optical filters is proposed where the core of a metal-insulator-metal square ring is replaced with a split-ring core (SRC). The proposed resonator supports split-ring-resonator-like (SRR-like) resonant modes that are characteristics of the structure. These resonant modes are highly adjustable, via the gap size of the split-ring core, over a range of hundreds of nanometers. The proposed resonator can also incorporate tunable materials localized in the gap of the SRC or placed throughout the resonating path. By varying the refractive index (1 to 2) of the material in the gap of the SRC, first and second SRR-like modes can be tuned over ~200 and 300 nm, respectively. A circuit model based on transmission-line theory is proposed for the structure and used to derive the resonance conditions of the split-ring-resonator-like modes; the model compares favorably to the numerical results. The proposed resonator has the potential to be utilized effectively in integrated nano-scale optical switches and tunable filters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".