MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076135104 · doi:10.1063/1.2967848

Synchronization of chaotic systems with delay using intermittent linear state feedback

2008· article· en· W2076135104 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaProgram for New Century Excellent Talents in UniversityTexas A and M University
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Synchronization of chaosControl theory (sociology)ChaoticChaotic systemsState (computer science)Lyapunov functionIntermittent controlComputer scienceDifferential (mechanical device)Function (biology)MathematicsControl (management)Topology (electrical circuits)Nonlinear systemPhysicsControl engineeringAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the synchronization of coupled chaotic systems with time delay by using intermittent linear state feedback control. An exponential synchronization criterion is obtained by means of Lyapunov function and differential inequality method. Numerical simulations on the chaotic Ikeda and Lu systems are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it