Priorities, barriers and facilitators for remote support of cancer symptoms: A survey of Canadian oncology nurses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A survey of 368 Canadian oncology nurses revealed that 54% provided remote support to oncology patients. The most common symptoms identified were fatigue, pain, nausea, constipation, and anxiety. Frequent symptoms which nurses felt low confidence in managing were anxiety, neuropathy, depression, anorexia and skin alterations. Most nurses agreed that guidelines were needed that were accessible, and improved continuity of care. Forty-three per cent of respondents felt that existing guidelines were inadequate for complex symptoms. Only 54% of respondents agreed they had received enough symptom management training. Common barriers included time constraints, obtaining accurate patient information via telephone, high workloads and knowledge or training deficits. Facilitating factors for provision of remote support included access to an electronic health record, accessible team members, available technology and ease of documentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it