MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2076151146 · doi:10.2118/98058-ms

(HC)3 Hydrocracking Technology

2005· article· en· W2076151146 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. K. Lott, TY Lee, J. J. Quinn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsIndustry, Tourism and Investment
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Refineries are processing bottoms and heavy oils to lighter products using either thermal cracking base technologies such as visbreaking, delayed and fluid coking, or solid catalyst base low to moderate hydroconversion technologies using fixed bed and ebullated bed reactors. Unconverted resid from ebullated bed reactor has also been fed to delayed coker to increase the distillates yield. These processes perform well for what they are designed to do. With the new fuel specifications of 10–50 parts per million sulfur restriction in transportation fuels, distillates produced from low conversion fixed bed and ebullated bed hydroprocessing will not meet the required ultra low sulfur content without further hydrotreating. For distillates produced from delayed and fluid coking, even more severe secondary processing is needed to reduce the aromatic and sulfur contents in order to meet the new fuel regulations. In light of the current high crude price, general decline in crude quality, and regulations mandated high quality, ultra low sulfur specifications for the transportation fuels, significant advantages exist for flexible technology that can overcome limitations of current bottoms of the barrel upgrading processes. The Alberta Government formed the Alberta Oil Sands Technology Research Authority (AOSTRA) in the 1970's to fund research and development of technologies to improve the economics of producing synthetic crude oil from its vast reserves of heavy oils and oil sands. These research programs provided new insight on the molecular structure of heavy oil, the chemistry of the various non-volatile fractions, especially on their tendency to form carbonaceous solids (coke) during upgrading. In the mid-1990's researchers at the Alberta Research Council (ARC) and AOSTRA developed a new upgrading technology called (HC)3TM, a hydro-conversion process that is designed to efficiently convert bottoms and residua rich in metals and asphaltenes to lighter products. In 2001, Headwaters Heavy Oil, Inc. (HHO), obtained a worldwide exclusive license from the Alberta Science and Research Authority (ASRA) to commercialize and market the (HC)3TM hydrocracking technology. The This paper describes the (HC)3TM technology, its applications to improve operations at existing supported catalyst hydroprocessing facilities and as a stand alone hydrocracker.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetroleum Processing and Analysis→French-language works237,207→