MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076173924 · doi:10.2116/bunsekikagaku.51.41

Laser pyrolysis gas chromatography system using a Q-switched Nd : YAP laser.

2002· article· en· W2076173924 on OpenAlexaff
Mikio KUZUYA, Kazushi HIROSE, Takuya MATSUOKA

Bibliographic record

VenueBUNSEKI KAGAKU · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyrenePyrolysisGas chromatographyLaserMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)BenzeneStyreneReproducibilityTolueneChromatographyFull width at half maximumChemistryOpticsPolymerOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pyrolysis gas chromatograph system using a pulsed Nd:YAP laser as a fragmentation source was constructed, which allowed for the direct analysis of solid samples. Several solid samples, such as ceramics (BN), coal, and polystyrene, were analyzed to test the performance of the system. The obtained chromatograms showed good reproducibility, and the relative standard deviations of the peak intensity, the FWHM, and the retention time were 1.4%, 2.2%, and 0.5%, respectively. In chromatograms obtained from polystyrene, the characteristic component peaks of benzene, toluene, and styrene monomer were detected. Moreover, a moderate defocusing of laser radiation brought about an increase in the signal intensity. The results showed that the present laser pyrolysis gas chromatograph is applicable to the analysis of solid samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBUNSEKI KAGAKUSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207