MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076185750 · doi:10.7202/019438ar

Entre le retrait et la contestation. Réactions des mormons fondamentalistes à des allégations d’entorses aux lois

2008· article· fr· W2076185750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCriminologie · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMormonism, Religion, and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cet article est de comprendre les effets sur un groupe de mormons polygames fondamentalistes établis à Bountiful, en Colombie-Britannique, d’allégations d’entorses aux lois. Ces allégations vont du trafic de jeunes femmes entre le Canada et les États-Unis afin de les marier à des hommes polygames plus âgés qu’elles aux sévices physiques et sexuels sur des enfants, des adolescents et des femmes. Des entretiens avec des membres de ce groupe ainsi que l’analyse documentaire du journal de la communauté, des échanges sur le forum de discussion Web du groupe et des principaux journaux et périodiques canadiens et étatsuniens de 1990 à 2006 ont permis de documenter les allégations et de cerner les réactions du groupe. Celles-ci sont distinguées en deux périodes, un premier temps où le groupe a réagi par un retrait silencieux, puis un second où la contestation a dominé. Ces réactions sont décrites, analysées et illustrées à l’aide d’extraits d’entretiens et d’échanges Web.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.312
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.025 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it