MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076186613 · doi:10.1021/ja063249a

Intramolecular C−H Activation Reactions of Molybdenacyclobutanes

2006· article· en· W2076186613 on OpenAlexaff
P.M. Graham, M.S.A. Buschhaus, Peter Legzdins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclohepteneChemistryCycloocteneCyclopenteneCycloalkeneDieneCyclohexeneIntramolecular forceAllylic rearrangementMedicinal chemistryExergonic reactionStereochemistryPhotochemistryNorborneneOrganic chemistryPolymerizationCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molybdenacyclobutane complexes can be prepared by reaction of Cp*Mo(NO)(=CHCMe3) (formed spontaneously by loss of neopentane from Cp*Mo(NO)(CH2CMe3)2 (1) under ambient conditions) with cyclic olefins, including cyclopentene, cycloheptene, and cyclooctene. The cyclopentene metallacyclobutane orients the metallacycle bridgehead protons cis to each other. A trans arrangement is observed for the cyclooctene congener, and both cis and trans orientations occur for the cycloheptene species. The reaction of 1 with cyclohexene initially forms a metallacyclobutane that then undergoes an allylic C-H activation to form an allyl-alkyl-coupled product with the concomitant loss of H2. The analogous allyl-alkyl structure is also observed as the thermodynamic product for the reactions of cycloheptene and cyclooctene with 1. The cyclooctene allyl-alkyl compound (5C) can be converted to an eta2-diene complex by heating with pyridine. Alternatively, heating of 5C in the presence of a variety of olefins displaces the diene ligand that can then be isolated in its unbound state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207