Topology information based decision trees to predict dynamic transfer limits and their sensitivities for Hydro-Quebec's network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a method, using data mining techniques, to find dynamic power transfer limits and sensitivity of the limits due to element variations for the Hydro-Quebec power system based on topology information. The paper illustrates a systematic way to automatically generate a tremendous amount of cases to represent a wide range of parameter variations and compute their corresponding transfer limits based on time-domain dynamic simulations. These transfer limits are used to determine the transfer limit sensitivity for each parameter. Data mining techniques are used to build regression trees on this huge database, generated by the supercomputer at IREQ (the Hydro-Quebec Research institute), to find the relationship between either the transfer limits or the Δlimits and parameter variations. The benefit of this method is its ability to determine limits and/or Δlimits without requiring time-domain simulations in future studies. Rapid access to these limits and the sensitivities of the status of specific elements can potentially be foreseen to aid planning engineers in the planning and execution steps of limit calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".