MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076219648 · doi:10.1021/jp048591t

Absolute Cross Sections for the Electron-Induced Formation of Unsaturated Hydrocarbons from Solid Cyclopropane

2004· article· en· W2076219648 on OpenAlexaff
Petra Swiderek, Mathieu C. Deschamps, M. Michaud, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclopropanePropeneElectronIntermolecular forceSubstrate (aquarium)Kinetic energyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Resolution (logic)Layer (electronics)Materials scienceMoleculeOrganic chemistryRing (chemistry)Catalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electron-stimulated reactions in solid films of cyclopropane, condensed on Ar spacers deposited on a Pt substrate, were induced and monitored simultaneously using a high-resolution electron-energy-loss spectrometer. Absolute cross sections for the formation of propene, including similar unsaturated species, were independently determined as σ p = (7.2± 3.9) × 10 -17 cm 2 and σ p = (9.6 ± 4.8) × 10 -17 cm 2 at an incident electron energy of 15 eV using both characteristic electronic and vibrational energy losses, respectively. The cross section obtained as a function of the film thickness of cyclopropane deposited on a fixed 5-layer spacer of Ar was found to increase above 3-layer coverage. This suggests that intermolecular reactions are not only involved, but also increase the production rate of unsaturated compounds in multilayer films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207