MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076220101 · doi:10.1300/j069v22n04_06

Gender Similarities and Differences

2003· review· en· W2076220101 on OpenAlex
Monica L. Zilberman, Hermano Tavares, Nady el‐Guebaly

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Addictive Diseases · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCanadian Centre on Substance Use and AddictionUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelescoping seriesAddictionSubstance useSubstance abuseMedicineDemographyPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in women's social role over the past years likely influenced the gender gap in substance use and substance-related disorders, with potentially significant prevention and treatment implications. The authors reviewed the literature about gender differences in prevalence estimates and course of substance-related disorders. Male-to-female ratios of prevalence estimates of substance use are narrowing in different countries. The initiation of substance use is progressively taking place at younger ages, the trend being more dramatic among women as compared to men. Women's accelerated progression to dependence (so-called "telescoping effect") is a robust finding among alcohol-dependent individuals, although the effect seems to be weaker among younger individuals. As for other drugs, the literature is weaker and further research is needed. It is concluded that women's earlier age of initiation of substance use, faster progression to dependence and under-representation in addiction treatments should be addressed in future health care planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it