MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076224297 · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/3

ON THE INTRINSIC CONTINUUM LINEAR POLARIZATION OF CLASSICAL Be STARS: THE EFFECTS OF METALLICITY AND ONE-ARMED DENSITY PERTURBATIONS

2013· article· en· W2076224297 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalmer seriesMetallicityPolarization (electrochemistry)StarsPerturbation (astronomy)Oscillation (cell signaling)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the effects of two disk properties on the continuum linear polarization signature of classical Be stars. First, we investigate the effect of including metallicity in computing the thermal structure of the circumstellar gas on the resulting polarimetric Balmer jump. The Balmer jump is a distinguishing feature of the polarization signature in these objects and, as such, can be used as a tool for differentiating classical Be stars from similar Hα-emitters identified through conventional photometric techniques. We find that although low-metallicity environments will have hotter disk temperatures on average, the temperature change alone cannot account for the discrepancy in the frequency of Balmer jumps between low-metallicity and solar-metallicity stellar populations. Second, we investigate the effect of including a global one-armed oscillation in the gas density distribution of the modeled disk. We find that a non-axisymmetric perturbation pattern yields discernible variations in the predicted polarization level. If these density oscillations are present in the inner region of classical Be star disks, the polarimetric variations should produce a periodic signature which can help characterize the dynamical nature of the gas near the star.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207