MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076247476 · doi:10.1039/c4ta02010c

Non-precious electrocatalysts synthesized from metal–organic frameworks

2014· article· en· W2076247476 on OpenAlexaff
Foroughazam Afsahi, Serge Kaliaguine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry A · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocatalystProton exchange membrane fuel cellCarbonizationChemical engineeringMaterials scienceElectrolyteCathodeCarbon fibersPyrolysisMetal-organic frameworkPyrolytic carbonInorganic chemistryCatalysisChemistryElectrodeElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryAdsorptionComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are considered as clean and efficient energy conversion devices with great potential to replace currently used internal combustion engines (ICEs) in the near future. Developing high-performance and less expensive non-precious metal electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode side is crucial for widespread application of PEMFCs. Herein an Fe-containing metal–organic framework (MOF) was employed as the sole precursor for preparing a cathode electrocatalyst. The Fe-MOF was synthesized and subsequently subjected to thermolysis under a non-reactive gas atmosphere followed by acid leaching and heat treatment under NH3 at different temperatures between 700 and 1000 °C. Upon pyrolysis, iron–nitrogen containing carbon active sites (Fe/N/C) were formed in parallel with development of an electronically conductive carbon medium produced through pyrolytic carbonization of the organic component of the MOF material. The prepared electrocatalysts were characterized by XRD, N2 physisorption, TEM and XPS. In a H2SO4 (pH = 1) electrolyte, the ORR onset potential of 0.915 V, and the half-wave potential of 0.811 V are achieved using the most promising electrocatalyst (C700/950). The membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) made of these electrocatalysts were also tested as a cathode in a H2/air single fuel cell. The most promising electrocatalyst (C700/950) demonstrated an open circuit voltage of 0.945 V and a maximum power density of 0.302 W cm−2 reached at 0.391 V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Chemistry ASame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207