Changes in the medium-range order during crystallization of aluminosilicate zeolites characterized by high-energy X-ray diffraction technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ZSM-5 and faujasite, which are aluminosilicate zeolites with different compositions, were synthesized without using organic structure-directing agents, and the changes in the medium-range order during the crystallization of ZSM-5 and faujasite were characterized by high-energy X-ray diffraction (HEXRD) technique. It is found that that the amorphous aluminosilicates have larger fraction of 4 membered ring (4R), compared to 6 membered ring (6R) that is the most dominant in amorphous silica. Furthermore, HEXRD measurements reveal that changes in the medium-range order are characteristic for each zeolite although crystallizations of both zeolites proceeded via a similar way: that is, the dissolution of amorphous precursors to solution followed by the nucleation and crystal growth of zeolite from the soluble species. In ZSM-5 crystallization, no major changes in the medium-range order are observed although slight decrease of the fraction of 4R is confirmed. On the other hand, clear changes in the medium-range order, especially on the ordering of 4R and 6R are confirmed in faujasite crystallization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".