Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English Scotland's highland and island communities are linked historically with Canada's eastern seaboard and both countries share a similar social care infrastructure. This article compares social work services in three different settings: western Newfoundland and Cape Breton in Canada and a Scottish island and highland community. The potentials for developing specifically rural models of social work are explored. French Les Highlands écossais et les communautés insulaires écossaises sont historiquement liées aux provinces atlantiques canadiennes et les deux contrées font preuve d'infrastructures similaires dans leurs services sociaux. Cet article compare les services sociaux dans trois endroits: l'Ouest Terre-neuvien et le Cap Breton au Canada et une île ainsi qu'une communauté des Highlands écossais. Le potentiel pour le développement de modèles de services sociaux spécifiquement ruraux est exploré. Spanish Las comunidades montañosas y de las islas de Escocia esta históricamente con la costa éste de Canadá y los dos países comparten infraestructura social de servicio. Este artículo compara los servicios de trabajo social en tres diferente localidades. El Oeste de Terranova y Cabo Bretón en Canadá, y una isla escocesa y una comunidad de zona alta. La potencialidad para desarrollar modelos de trabajos social rurales es explorado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it